Car shoppers certainly have a number of
priorities in mind when making their
ultimate purchase decisions, and typically
safety is high on their lists. In early
December 2006, the Insurance Institute for
Highway Safety (IIHS) gave shoppers
additional information to ponder by naming
13 vehicles as their Top Safety Picks for
the 2007 model year.
A nonprofit research and communications
organization funded by auto insurers, the
IIHS conducts 40 mph offset frontal crash
tests, side-impact crash tests and rear
crash tests on a selection of new models
each year. The vehicles on the Safety Picks
list performed the best in all these tests
and offer the best protection for their
passengers. For this year, the IIHS has
added the requirement that a vehicle must
have Electronic Stability Control (ESC) to
be considered as a Top Safety Pick.
"Our crash tests cover the most common
kinds of real-world collisions," says
Institute president Adrian Lund.
"Designating Top Safety Pick winners based
on the tests makes it easier for consumers
to identify vehicles that afford the best
overall protection without sifting through
multiple sets of comparative test results."
This Year's Winners
The winning vehicles were chosen from among
current models of small, midsize and large
cars, plus minivans, small SUVs, midsize
SUVs and luxury SUVs. This was the first
year that SUVs were considered eligible to
be a Top Safety Pick from the IIHS.
The IIHS chose 13 vehicles in these seven
categories as the safest vehicles. There
were no domestic-brand vehicles in the
winners, and several winners from 2006 did
not make the grade for 2007.
The IIHS calls out the Ford Five Hundred,
Mercury Montego and Chevrolet Malibu as
doing well in the crash tests but not
offering stability control. These vehicles
were Top Safety Picks in 2006. The Honda
Civic was also a winner from last year that
didn't make the grade for 2007. According to
the IIHS, this was because most Civics don't
have ESC, and those that do don't have rear
head restraints rated "good" for rear crash
tests. No small cars were considered Top
Safety Picks for 2007.
"The idea of tightening the criteria for
the award is to encourage more vehicle
safety improvements," Lund says. "Last year
a car could win with an acceptable rating in
the rear test instead of the highest rating
of good, and ESC wasn't considered. Now it's
tougher to win, and some of the 2006 winners
don't meet the criteria for this year's
award because the manufacturers haven't
improved the head restraints from acceptable
to good or don't offer ESC."
Subaru and Honda/Acura had three winners
in this year's list, while Audi fielded two
top picks, the only other manufacturer with
more than one winning vehicle. Honda winners
include the
Pilot,
CR-V and
Acura RDX. The
Legacy,
Forester and
B9 Tribeca were top picks from Subaru.
Audi had the only large car winner—the
A6—and the midsize
A4 was also a winner.
Crash Test Evaluations
The IIHS's frontal crash evaluations are
based on results of 40-mph frontal offset
crash tests. Each vehicle's evaluation is
based on the amount of intrusion into the
passenger compartment, injury measures from
a Hybrid III dummy in the driver seat, and
analysis of slow-motion film to assess how
well dummy's movements were controlled by
the restraint system during the test.
Each vehicle's side evaluation is based
on performance in a crash test in which the
side of the vehicle is struck by a barrier
moving at 31 mph. Ratings reflect injury
measures recorded on two instrumented
SID-IIs dummies, assessment of head
protection countermeasures, and the
vehicle's structural performance during the
impact.
Injury measures obtained from the two
dummies, one in the driver seat and the
other in the back seat behind the driver,
are used to determine the likelihood that a
driver and/or passenger in a real-world
crash would have sustained serious injury.
The movements and contacts of the dummies'
heads during the crash also are evaluated.
Structural performance is based on
measurements indicating the amount of
B-pillar intrusion into the passenger
compartment.
Rear crash protection is rated according
to a two-step procedure. First, measurements
are taken of head restraint geometry—the
height of a restraint and its horizontal
distance behind the back of the head of an
average-size man. Seats with good or
acceptable restraint geometry are tested
dynamically using a dummy that measures
forces on the neck. This test simulates a
collision in which a stationary vehicle is
struck in the rear at 20 mph. Seats without
good or acceptable geometry are rated poor
overall.
Here are the IIHS's Top Safety Picks for
2007:
Large Cars
-
Audi A6 (manufactured in Dec. 2006
and later)
Midsize Cars
-
Audi A4
-
Saab 9-3
-
Subaru Legacy
Minivans
-
Hyundai Entourage
-
Kia Sedona
Luxury SUVs
-
Mercedes-Benz M-Class
-
Volvo XC90
Midsize SUVs
-
Acura RDX
-
Honda Pilot
-
Subaru B9 Tribeca
Small SUVs
-
Honda CR-V
-
Subaru Forester